As discussed in my February 9th post above, the recent discovery of two new lines of research information points to the need to reopen the discussion on the likely landing site of Keokuk Chalk #4. This new information includes John Szweda’s discovery of additional aerial coverage of Landing Zone E and Hans den Brok’s discovery of what is essentially the Keokuk Mission After Action Report (AAR) of F/O Winfield C. Goulden, the pilot of Chalk #4. With regards to those two discoveries… Aerial Coverage of Landing Zone E The long held and most favored theory of this thread with regards to the landing site of Keokuk Chalk #4 is that the glider landed on the western tree line of the field south of the Pratt Memorial. This theory is significantly based on two data points. First, in George Koskimaki’s D-Day with the Screaming Eagles: Sergeant McCarthy’s glider Number '4' had come to rest safely in a soft field only twenty yards from a hedgerow. He observed, “Glider Number 3 which was just in front of ours slammed into an earthen bank and collapsed in a pile of splinters. The co-pilot was killed as were several MP’s and headquarters people. I raced over to give aid and was immediately fired upon from a hedgerow corner. I assumed a prone position quickly. Uninjured glidermen from the wrecked craft were removing those who had survived the crash. Based on this narrative, we made an assumption (now determined to be incorrect, based on the recently discovered aerial coverage) that Chalks #3 and 4 came to rest relatively close, or adjacent to each other, in the landing field. Now, it is clear that my father’s comments concerning the relative positions of the two gliders; “Glider Number 3 which was just in front of ours slammed into an earthen bank and collapsed in a pile of splinters” was not referring to their positions in the LZ. Rather, his comments appear to be referring to their relative positions in the formation on the ground at Aldermaston or inflight. However, other recently discovered information (Goulden’s AAR), confirms that Chalks #3 and 4, while not directly adjacent, did come to a stop in the same LZ field. Second, based on this inaccurate assumption, Pat reviewed aerial coverage, looking for two Horsa gliders in close proximity somewhere to the SW of Hiesville. He found such a possibility in NCAP US7_1857_405 taken on June 12th. Our most likely accepted theory has been that Chalk #3 is the “Second Horsa?” and Chalk #4 is the glider just to the north. Then, a couple of years ago, John Szweda discovered a photo in Gary Dettore’s Screaming Eagle Gliders that provides a different perspective. The photo, an oblique view, was taken over the vicinity of Vierville and it looks to the west. This shot provides a clear view of the east side of the tree line on the western boundary of the field south of Pratt Field. Taken by the pilot with his personal camera, the photo is low resolution, but it clearly indicates that there is only one, not two, Horsa gliders on that tree line. I recently contacted Gary Dettore and he granted me permission to post the Fort family photo from his book here. The red arrow points to the western tree line of the field south of Pratt and our current best candidate for Chalk #4. Source: Screaming Eagle Gliders, with permission of the author. A close-up of the field south of Pratt clearly indicates only one Horsa on the western tree line. Source: Screaming Eagle Gliders, with permission of the author. Last month, John Szweda also discovered NCAP_NARA_US7_1775_S_0068, taken on June 7th, which provides additional aerial coverage of Landing Zone E. With Pat’s assistance, we obtained a high-resolution copy of this shot from NCAP a few weeks ago. This oblique view not only confirms that there is only one Horsa on the western tree line of the field south of Pratt, it also provides insight into several other research theories related to this field along with Pratt Field. I’ll let John expand on that in a separate post. A portion of US7_1775_S_0068 Source: National Collection of Aerial Photography F/O Winfield Goulden’s Keokuk Mission After Action Report (AAR) The narrative in Goulden’s AAR contributes to this discussion in two primary ways. First, from the text, it is clear that Goulden and my father were together for at least a portion of their journey from the landing site of Chalk #4 to the 101st Command Post in Hiesville on the night of June 6th. The level of detail concerning that night provided by Goulden far surpasses the level provided by my father and will most certainly assist with this research effort. Second, in his text, Goulden mentions his encounter with at least two other gliders during his trek to the Division CP. This information may allow us to link the possibly known location of at least one of these two gliders to the location of Chalk #4. Specifically, Goulden’s report states: We passed a glider that had crashed into the trees bordering the field the night before. I glanced insider and almost got sick… the copilot and one passenger were still in their seats. They were horribly mangled… attempts to cut them out of the entangled steel tubing had thus far failed. We moved on. My first thought is that the glider Goulden encountered might have been General Pratt’s Chicago Chalk #1. However, there is some question as to when the General’s remains were removed from the glider. (See article by Major Leon Spencer: World War 2 Glider Pilot Charles E. Skidmore Jr.: The Death of General Don F. Pratt) Therefore, I want to approach the question of which Chicago Chalk this might be by accounting for the other Chicago Mission pilot KIAs, specifically the co-pilot KIAs, and determine if any of these Chalks could have been in the area. More on that line of research in future posts. While I still believe that the field south of Pratt remains the most likely landing site of Chalk #4, I remain open to consider other possibilities (including a Pratt Field option). With all this being said, I would like to open this discussion for comments from others. Again, my thanks to John and Hans for providing the new aerials and the AAR, respectively, and to Pat and Neil for their assistance. R/ Kevin
Hi All, Part of the updated theory on the locations of chalk #3 and #4 comes from discussions with Pat when we were together in the area back during my visit to Normandy back in June of 2018. We had walked the area and had discussed at our farmhouse "headquarters" that we could not just assume a glider was in front of chalk #4 when photo evidence didn't show it. So then we reconsidered the idea that maybe the statement of chalk #3 being in front of #4 was a reference to as how they flew in echelon over the landing zone, and just before or after release. We also discussed that if Chalk #3 was on the ground in front of #4, would M/Sgt John McCarthy used language like "raced over" to detail how he may have moved 20 feet forward into a hedgerow to chalk #3. After all racing over then hitting the ground to avoid MG fire and crawling makes it seem like there is a distance between the two horsas, and it was more than we originally thought. The theory then became that horsa #3 may be the horsa crashed into the southernmost bend of the Route de Rabey, a bit west of the General Pratt location. MG guns in the corners of the field to the south would have to shoot uphill in the direction of Route de Rabey, and the upward trajectory would likely allow for the group of men to crawl off the field under the arc of the MG fire. Later discovery of the Fort photo in the book by Gary Dettore had confirmed there was no horsa in the west hedgerow near chalk #4... But another aerial I found (US7 1775 S_0068) showed a little bit more of the same area and that the possibility exists that McCarthy's horsa could be in the field north of the Route de Rabey as there seemed to be a possible wreck location near that horsa, but not enough to confirm. All I can really suggest is if that was chalk #4 then they would likely had made an escape off the field by moving down hill to the south hedgerow to escape MG fire, then down along to the east and past both the chalk #3 and Pratt wrecks. The compilation of 3 aerials shows the same areas below. John
Thank you for accepting my request to join the forum. I'm a Cincinnati native who has been working with World War Two veterans since 2015. That same year I set out online to find a local 101st Airborne Paratrooper who had been killed in action that I could adopt to visit each year and I came across the name Raymond DeMonge. It just so happened that he was buried about 2 1/2 miles from my mother in law's house in Fayetteville, Ohio. Through research I found one of his family members on Facebook and they were able to give me a face to his name and I have been visiting his resting place every Memorial Day since. I've been back to Normandy twice and have friends that live there and was recently doing more research about how and where he was killed in action and I came across this thread. So to conclude, I'm just here to observe and hopefully learn more about where exactly it was that Raymond killed in Chalk #8 on the evening of June 6, 1944. Thank you for the work that you have all put in to this research. It's incredible and I hope one day we are able to have a definitive answer! Kindest, Patrick Here is an image of me honoring his resting place back in 2019. I also made a little video, which is on YouTube...
Patrick, Great job on your tribute video. The focus of my research has obviously been my father’s glider, Keokuk Chalk #4. However, I have also discovered a significant amount of information concerning Keokuk Chalks #3, 7 and 8 that is related to my Chalk #4 research. Specifically, I believe that my father most likely encountered the crash site of Keokuk Chalk #8 on the morning June 7th as he made his way to the Division CP in Hiesville. This encounter has served to assist me in confirming the most likely landing site of Keokuk Chalk #4. Below are some of the highlights of my Keokuk Chalk #8 research: Keokuk Chalk #8, carrying members of the 101st Airborne Division Signal Company, crashed through a hedgerow upon landing, crossed a road and then crashed through a second hedgerow, killing three 101st troopers, wounding approximately six to eight others while killing the pilot and wounding the co-pilot. Based on my research to date, Chalk #8 probably sustained the most landing-related casualties of any Keokuk glider Utilizing multiple sources, along with the Morning Reports (MR) obtained from the National Archives in College Park, MD for the 101st Airborne Division for the month of June 1944, Forum member Don Hillhouse and I were able to develop this almost complete manifest for Keokuk Chalk #8. 2nd LT Sam Shapiro – KIA F/O Sylvan Runkle – WIA PFC Raymond Demonge – MIA changed to KIA on subsequent MR T/5 Robert McCullum – MIA changed to KIA on subsequent MR T/5 William Weber – KIA on MR T/5 Harrison – SWA on MR T/5 Ted Lawler – SWA on MR PVT Lester Gunderson - LIA on MR CPL or T/5 Milton Reese - WIA PVT Eugene Hart - SIA on MR T/5 Charles Laden - No injuries, walked-away SWA: Seriously Wounded in Action LIA: Lightly Injured in Action SIA: Seriously Injured in Action With regards to PFC Demonge and T/5 McCullum, they were initially listed on the 101st Signal Company MR for June 20th as MIA and their status was changed to KIA on the 101st Signal Company MR for June 26th. (See Post #102 of this thread for additional information on this topic.) Possibly the only unscathed survivor of the Keokuk Chalk #8 crash landing was T/5 Charles Laden. By chance, T/5 Laden and my father became post-war friends, living just a few miles apart on the outskirts of Chicago. During my youth, I had the opportunity to meet Mr. Laden numerous times. While he made no mention of his war time experiences to me, he did provide a very detailed summary of the landing Keokuk Chalk #8 on the ww2airborne.com website. (Unfortunately, this summary is no longer available online.) T/5 Laden’s summary included the following: “When we did finally touch the ground, we continued to skid at a very high rate of speed. Evidently the smooth Norman grass in the fields was too slick to slow us down. We crashed through a hedgerow at the edge of one field and the wings of the glider were torn off. We continued to slide until finally crashing into another hedgerow that stopped us. Unfortunately due to the impact, we were torn up pretty bad. The pilot and co-pilot were both ejected, killing one of them. Also killed were a few guys from my company, Pfc. Raymond Demonge, T/5 Robert McCullum, and T/5 William Weber. Both the motorcycles ended up hanging in the trees, and the trailer and other equipment was tossed everywhere. Staff Sergeant Harrison who had been sitting in the tail section was alive, but wounded badly. I was also thrown from the wreckage, but miraculously I was fine, except for bumps and bruises on my right leg. I brushed myself off and then helped Harrison out of the wreckage and into a ditch at the side of the field for cover. A few minutes later a jeep from our signals company drove up and the driver told me to get in. I was then driven to General Taylor’s command post that he had established at a farmhouse in Hiesville.” (See Post #28 of this thread for additional information on this topic.) In November of 2013, I was fortunate to have had the opportunity to speak with F/O Lynus Ryan, the co-pilot of Keokuk Chalk #7. F/O Ryan observed the crash landing of Chalk #8 as he made his own approach to landing in a nearby field. The key points of that conversation related to Chalk #8 are provided below: Chalk #7 landed “right behind” and “relatively close” to Chalk #8 as Ryan described it. Ryan reiterated three times during our discussion that Chalk #8 went through a hedgerow, crossed a road and went through a second hedgerow before stopping in a field on the other side of a road from where Chalk #7 landed. Ryan stated that he believed that Chalk #7 landed west of Chalk #8 and that “just about everyone was killed” in Chalk #8. (The full details of this conversation can be found in Post #69 of this thread.) Based on the research mentioned above and other sources, while not 100% certain, several members of this Forum believe that the most likely landing site of Keokuk #8 is just south of Hiesville on the east side of Route de Rabey. See photo below: Finally, in George Koskimaki’s D-Day with the Screaming Eagles there is a photograph of a badly wrecked Horsa, identified in the book only as a “glider carrying men and motorcycles of the 101st Airborne Signal Company on the evening flight”. During my September 2013 interview with Mr. Koskimaki, he stated that he is positive that the wrecked Horsa glider pictured in his book is Keokuk Chalk #8. He also stated that Signal Company personnel or 326th Medical Company personnel were the most likely source of this photograph. Keokuk Chalk #8 Crash Site If you have any questions once you have had a chance to review the Keokuk Chalk #8 material on this thread, let me know. R/ Kevin
Thank you kindly! It's been a real honor to regularly visit his resting place. I'm glad I live close by. Coincidently, the cemetery where he is buried is Saint Patrick's Cemetery and my name is Patrick!
On this 80th anniversary of D-Day, in honor and memory of all who served in Normandy that day, including my father, Master Sergeant John T. McCarthy, 101st Airborne Division (Mission Keokuk, Chalk #4).
Hi All, I ran an extract of NCAP_NARA_US71775_0068 through PS today and came up with this: I am unsure of the date this photo was taken as the sortie index does not appear to be scanned on the NCAP site. However, the next assigned sortie number, 1776, is scanned and is dated 7th June, so I assume sortie 1775 was also flown on the same day. I can confirm only one glider on the western side of the field. Regards, Pat
Hi Pat, Yes I have a high resolution copy of the frame you mention above, and it was taken on June 7th. I came across the frame while searching sorties and knew it would be of some use. I used the aerial in part of a new theory that myself and Kevin discussed in post #141 and #142 in this thread. I also had to clean it up a bit as the original sent photo was that "foggy" to look at. If you would like a copy of the high resolution aerial let me know and i will put it in my google drive for you to download. John
Hi John, Yourself and Kevin have already kindly sent me copies of three frames from Sortie 1775 - frame 0068 (Starboard); frame 0120 (Port) and 0121 (Port). I must get onto NCAP and ask them to scan the Index for Sortie 1775 as I suspect many more frames from this run would be of interest. If I am reading things correctly above, Kevin and yourself are now considering the western hedgerow of Pratt Field as the site where Keokuk Chalk #8 crashed. Have you ruled out the bend in the southern hedgerow of this same field? Thanks, Pat
Hi Pat, No, I kind of ruled out the western hedgerow of the Pratt field as nothing could be seen along that hedgerow either. I've more come to the conclusion that the Horsa wreck Sgt John McCarthy moved over to is the northern hedgerow of the McCarthy field since it is the only place we can see a clear debris field from a Horsa landing north to south through the road. I tried to summarize my conclusion in post #142 with the Red printing being the old theory, and the yellow printing being my newer theory... I think something maybe of interest in the McCarthy description of the incident was that after all the racing over, then hitting the ground to avoid MG fire, and crawling makes it seem like there is a distance between the two horsas, and it was more than we originally thought. John
Pat, Thanks for enhancing the photo and for taking another look at this thread. Back in early 2021 and the year prior, John and I discovered three new pieces of research material that reopened our discussion concerning Keokuk Chalk #4. (For newcomers, see Posts #141 and #142 of this thread for additional details.) First, John found the two photos mentioned above (the Fort Family photo from Gary Dettore’s book and US7_1775_S_0068) that clearly show only one Horsa glider on the western hedgerow boundary of McCarthy Field. This discovery quickly disproved our long-held theory that two Horsa gliders (Keokuk Chalks # 3 and 4) came to rest on the western edge of McCarthy Field. However, as John outlined above, I also believe that it is still most likely that Chalk #4 came to rest on the western boundary of McCarthy Field and that Chalk #3 possibly came to rest on the northern boundary. Photographic evidence in US7_1857_405 taken on June 12th indicates some disturbed earth, a possible break in the hedgerow, and a single Horsa fuselage rib on the northern boundary. While nothing is visible in this general area in US7_1775_S_0068, perhaps, as you mentioned, a review of more frames from this run might provide something of interest. I would appreciate your help with this effort. In early 2021, at about the same time John came across US7_1775_S_0068, Hans den Brok forwarded me a copy of what is essentially the Keokuk Mission After Action Report (AAR) of F/O Winfield C. Goulden, the pilot of Chalk #4. I believe that the information in Goulden’s AAR clearly points to the area to the SW of Hiesville as the location of his Landing Zone (LZ). In his text, Goulden mentions his encounter with at least two other gliders during his trek to the Division CP from the LZ. This information may allow us to link the possibly known location of at least one of these two gliders to the location of Chalk #4. Specifically, Goulden’s report states: We passed a glider that had crashed into the trees bordering the field the night before. I glanced insider and almost got sick… the copilot and one passenger were still in their seats. They were horribly mangled… attempts to cut them out of the entangled steel tubing had thus far failed. We moved on. My first thought is that the glider Goulden encountered might have been General Pratt’s Chicago Chalk #1. However, there is some question as to when the General’s remains were removed from the glider. (See article by Major Leon Spencer: World War 2 Glider Pilot Charles E. Skidmore Jr.: The Death of General Don F. Pratt). Therefore, I want to approach the question of which Chicago Chalk this might be by accounting for the other Chicago Mission pilot KIAs, specifically the co-pilot KIAs, and determine if any of these Chalks could have been in the area. Pat and John (or others), from your previous research, do you have any of this data, or can you point me in the right direction for the information, if it is even available? Pat and John, I appreciate you revisiting this discussion. R/ Kevin
Hi Kevin, From Philippe Esvelin's 'Forgotten Wings', the list of 434th TCG KIA for Mission Chicago is as follows: Ahmad, Thomas D (Co-Pilot, Waco #42) Birdzell, Ivan W. Butler, John M (Co-Pilot, Waco #1) Shapiro, Samuel B. Willoughby, Jack L (Pilot, Waco #3) I'll have to do a bit of digging to get the gliders of Birdzell and Shapiro as both are missing from the Chicago crew list in the same book. Regards, Pat
Another Chicago KIA... Griffin, Clinton H. (Co-Pilot, Waco #40) Flight Officer Griffin (T-1148) was from the 89th TCS, 438th TCG; the Group which took in the first serial of Mission Elmira, so on loan to the 434th TCG for Mission Chicago. In any event, Waco #40 crashed in the Beuzeville la Bastille area and therefore, I'd say, can be eliminated from consideration. Regards, Pat
Hi All, I see a definite break in hedgerow in this 1947 IGN cover: I have little doubt now but that this is the location of the Horsa #8 crash site. Regards, Pat
Pat, The break in the hedgerow in the 1947 IGN aerial appears to be on the north side of Route de Rabey and on the southern perimeter of Pratt Field. I think we are looking for a break in the hedgerow on the south side of the road on the northern boundary of McCarthy Field. US7_1857_405 taken on June 12th indicates some disturbed earth, a possible break in the hedgerow, and a single Horsa fuselage rib on the northern boundary of McCarthy Field. Do you see anything that would suggest that? John and I believe this area is potentially associated with Keokuk Chalk #3, not Chalk #8. We covered what we believe is the Chalk #8 landing site extensively in Posts #69-76 of this thread. Back in 2013, I spoke with F/O Lynus Ryan (co-pilot of Chalk #7) and he told me that he observed Chalk #8 land in a field just to the south of Hiesville. With regards to the Troop Carrier KIA lists that you and John provided, we can also eliminate 2nd LT Sam Shapiro from consideration as he was the pilot of Keokuk Chalk #8. That perhaps leaves the KIA glider pilots associated with the lower number Chicago Chalks as being in the glider that F/O Goulden encountered. I will have to look at some reference material I have which discusses the other Chicago chalks that ended up in/near the hedgerow on the southern boundary of Pratt Field. Finally, I want to take another look at F/O Goulden’s AAR. In that report, he mentioned encountering two gliders on his journey from the Chalk #4 landing site to the 101st CP in Hiesville. One of these two gliders is the one that Goulden described as having crashed the night before with a KIA co-pilot and passenger. I believe the second glider he referenced was Keokuk Chalk #3. The timeline Goulden outlined in his narrative suggests that the two gliders he referenced were in close proximity to each other. That points to the stretch of Route de Rabey between Pratt and McCarthy Fields as the potential location for both gliders. More after I review Goulden’s AAR. R/ Kevin
Hi Kevin, Why are you so sure the glider approached the laneway from the south? I think it approached from the north, crashed completely through the northern hedgerow and became mangled as it impacted the southern hedgerow, with some of the forward section creating a debris field in the field to the south of the laneway. Have a look at this Getty Images film here - I believe the two seconds of footage at 00:00:14 to 00:00:15 shows this debris field, with the camera man shooting towards the site of the crash from beside the sole Horsa we now know to be in this field. The footage immediately after this scene is clearly the mixed Horsa/Waco cluster just up the road aways at the Pond Field. Regards, Pat
Pat and Kevin, For the record I also believe like you do Pat that chalk #3 landed north to south with a portion of the debris flying into the McCarthy field. As we saw this field in person back in 2018 we saw the Pratt Field run downhill north to south and that may have also aided in the wreck of Horsa chalk #3. If Chalk #4 released slightly later than #3 it may have held enough altitude to clear the road at that location (Rte de Rabey) to end up where it was.